From Text to Ecosystem: The Triple Convergence of Digital Humanities, Transnational Flows, and Environmental Narrative
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64229/ysvmrp41Keywords:
Digital Humanities, Environmental Narrative, Transnationalism, Ecocriticism, Geospatial Analysis, Network Analysis, AnthropoceneAbstract
This article proposes a critical framework for understanding the intersection of three dynamic fields: Digital Humanities (DH), studies of transnational mobility, and environmental narrative. Moving beyond the traditional confines of textual analysis, it argues that the methodological toolkit of the Digital Humanities-including geospatial mapping, network analysis, and large-scale text mining-provides the essential means to trace, visualize, and analyze the complex relationships between human movement and environmental imagination across national and cultural boundaries. The article first establishes the theoretical underpinnings of this convergence, drawing from ecocriticism, postcolonial theory, and mobility studies. It then presents a conceptual "Three-Dimensional Analysis Framework" that integrates spatial, relational, and semantic layers of inquiry. Through illustrative case studies, the article demonstrates how DH methods can map the "eco-geographies" in transnational novels, uncover the networked agencies in climate change discourse, and track the semantic shifts in environmental rhetoric across different cultural contexts. The analysis reveals that this triple convergence not only expands the scale and precision of literary and cultural analysis but also fosters a more nuanced, systemic understanding of the global ecological crisis as a narratively constructed and materially consequential phenomenon. The article concludes by addressing the ethical and methodological challenges of this approach and posits its potential for fostering a more planetary, interdisciplinary mode of humanistic inquiry.
References
[1]Ghosh, A. (2016). The great derangement: Climate change and the unthinkable. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226323176.001.0001
[2]Heise, U. K. (2008). Sense of place and sense of planet: The environmental imagination of the global. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195335637.001.0001
[3]Nixon, R. (2011). Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061194
[4]Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268
[5]Jockers, M. L. (2013). Macroanalysis: Digital methods and literary history. University of Illinois Press. https://doi.org/10.5406/illinois/9780252037528.001.0001
[6]Schreibman, S., Siemens, R., & Unsworth, J. (Eds.). (2016). A new companion to digital humanities. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118680605
[7]Liu, A. (2012). The state of the digital humanities: A report and a critique. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 11(1-2), 8–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022211427364
[8]Jänicke, S., Franzini, G., Cheema, M. F., & Scheuermann, G. (2015). On close and distant reading in digital humanities: A survey and future challenges. EuroVis Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.2312/eurovisstar.20151113
[9]Piper, A. (2018). Enumerations: Data and literary study. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226568898.001.0001
[10]Underwood, T. (2019). Distant horizons: Digital evidence and literary change. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226612973.001.0001
[11]LeMenager, S. (2014). Living oil: Petroleum culture in the American century. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199899425.001.0001
[12]D'Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020). Data feminism. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11805.001.0001
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tanaka Yuto (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.